On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 10:09 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 8:09 PM Matheus Alcantara
> <matheusssilv97@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed Jun 10, 2026 at 2:15 AM -03, Ayush Tiwari wrote:
> > >> One minor naming observation: the new fdwPrivLists field in
> > >> ModifyTableState doesn't follow the mt_ prefix convention used by the
> > >> other re-indexed lists (mt_updateColnosLists, mt_mergeActionLists,
> > >> mt_mergeJoinConditions). Should we rename it to mt_fdwPrivLists for
> > >> consistency?
> > >>
> > >
> > > I think yes, it makes sense to rename it.
> > >
> >
> > Attached v2 renamed, thanks.
> >
> > (Also CC Amit on this since he committed cbc127917e0 which I believe
> > that is when the issue started)
>
> Thanks for adding me. I'll take a look at this early next week.
I looked, and the patch seems straightforward enough.
Before committing it, I'd like to wait briefly to see if Fujita-san
has any thoughts on the FDW-side concerns, since he has already chimed
in on the thread.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote