On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 6:51 PM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 5:05 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 5:18 PM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I only reviewed and applied patch 0001 on my local machine, and it
> > > successfully fixed the crash.
> > >
> > > One minor comment:
> > >
> > > + if (fpentry->flushing)
> > > + {
> > > + ri_FastPathCheck(riinfo, fk_rel, newslot);
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > Would it be worth wrapping the condition with unlikely()? It seems
> > > this branch is expected to be false in most cases, not a strong
> > > opinion though.
> >
> > Good idea. Will do.
> >
> > Are you planning to look at 0002?
>
> I just applied 0002 and ran the regression successfully.
>
> I have one trivial comment, subXact abort doesn't NULL the
> ri_fastpath_cache, so I think the following comment of
> RI_FastPathEntry should be polished accordingly by removing the
> `SubXactCallback`.
>
> * ri_FastPathEndBatch(); on abort, ResourceOwner releases the cached
> * relations and the XactCallback/SubXactCallback NULL the static cache pointer
> * to prevent any subsequent access.
Thanks for the review. Yes, I missed that.
I've updated the patches to address your comments and did some other polishing.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote