Re: RI fastpath misses checking EXECUTE on functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: RI fastpath misses checking EXECUTE on functions
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqH=TakHqLfoYZQWQBvijRoZV3O-FF3tWALOMGXtk2dpSg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: RI fastpath misses checking EXECUTE on functions  (Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Kirill,

On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 9:37 PM Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Sept 2026 at 07:16, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 8:45 PM Matheus Alcantara
> > <matheusssilv97@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 25/09/26 05:16, Amit Langote wrote:
> > > >> ri_CheckFunctionPermissions(riinfo, fpmeta) passes both when fpmeta
> > > >> == riinfo->fpmeta. I'm wondering if we could just pass riinfo?
> > > >
> > > > That's just for consistency with build_index_scankeys(); it isn't
> > > > needed, so I don't feel strongly either way.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ok, make sense.
> > >
> > > >> IIUC this patch only fix the case for FastPath without batching right?
> > > >> Since batching is still on master, I'm wondering if we could also fix
> > > >> it. See attached patch (v2-0001 is your v1-0001).
> > > >
> > > > I've left the batch code alone because I intend to revert it from
> > > > master too sometime next week. Thanks for the patch, though.

As I wrote here, I intend to revert this piece of code in master.  I
haven't gotten around to it yet due to some personal circumstances at
the moment, but I aim to get it done by EOW.

Thanks for your attention and the patch nonetheless.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kirill Reshke
Date:
Subject: Re: RI fastpath misses checking EXECUTE on functions
Next
From: Maxime Schoemans
Date:
Subject: Re: Set calcSumX2 = true in numeric_(poly_)deserialize