Re: slotname vs slot_name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: slotname vs slot_name
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqGh39v0xOtEGqCCg-ZvW4DxcNBSqCRm-zTQr3wOq=-Fyw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: slotname vs slot_name  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: slotname vs slot_name  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> I like using "slot_name" everywhere, i.e, even in recovery.conf.
> primary_slot_name seems not so long name.
>
> BTW, what about also renaming pg_llog directory? I'm afraid that
> a user can confuse pg_log with pg_llog.
>

Recently I came across this while tab-completing pg_log ;-)
I remember asking to document pg_llog elsewhere.

--
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Next
From: David G Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: Sigh, we need an initdb