Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqG3bw0ZynQDinUJ76q9LPrGGRNHKnX32Y7VWcFRA9FZpA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to ModifyTable overheads in generic plans  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:36 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to discuss a refactoring patch that builds on top of the
> patches at [1] to address $subject.

I forgot to update a place in postgres_fdw causing one of its tests to crash.

Fixed in the attached updated version.

-- 
Amit Langote
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: Creating a function for exposing memory usage of backend process
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.