Re: a curious case of force_parallel_mode = on with jit'ing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: a curious case of force_parallel_mode = on with jit'ing
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqG2xspusrA2Xs8ogCkCFmE5V0KkOL6ra+jEzTxy5O2YEQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: a curious case of force_parallel_mode = on with jit'ing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:41 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:08 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Works for me on HEAD (using RHEL8.3, gcc 8.3.1, LLVM 10.0.1).
>
> > Thanks for checking.  Must be my LLVM setup I guess:
>
> > $ llvm-config --version
> > 7.0.1
> > $ cat /etc/redhat-release
> > CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core)
> > $ gcc --version
> > gcc (GCC) 9.1.1 20190605 (Red Hat 9.1.1-2)
>
> Hmmm ... seems like an odd combination to have a newer gcc and an
> older LLVM than what RHEL8 is shipping.  Is this really the current
> recommendation on CentOS 7?

Not an official combination.  At some point last year I decided to
install a more modern gcc than what CentOS 7 officially provides and
ended up getting them through a Software Collections (scl) package
called devtoolset-9.

-- 
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_replication_origin_drop API potential race condition
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we have a new SQL callable function to get Postmaster PID?