Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFvQRkiUYnNohzUmcHarLhvyYFmfvdiSaMjitp4czoFuw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:19 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 05:08:59PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> >
> > I think I've managed to apply f4566345cf40b into v13 and v14.  Patches attached.
> >
>
> FTR this doesn't play well with the cfbot unfortunately as it tries to apply
> both patches, and obviously on the wrong branches anyway.

Oops, that's right.  Thanks for the heads up.

> It means that the previous-0002-now-0001 patch that Álvaro previously sent
> (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202201052227.bc4yvvy6lqpb%40alvherre.pgsql)
> is not tested anymore, and IIUC it's not pushed yet so it's not ideal.

Agreed.

> There's now an official documentation on how to send patches that should be
> ignored by the cfbot [1], so sending backpatch versions with a .txt extension
> could be useful.  Just in case I'm attaching the pending patch to this mail to
> make the cfbot happy again.

Thanks and sorry I wasn't aware of the rule about sending back patch versions.

--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Efrain J. Berdecia"
Date:
Subject: Custom Operator for citext LIKE predicates question
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows vs recovery tests