Re: table partitioning and access privileges - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: table partitioning and access privileges
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFbwt4=KQy3S4OOqi=Pi4QywNXxfqesAkAObxjUD9okVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: table partitioning and access privileges  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: table partitioning and access privileges
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 2:07 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> On 2020/02/03 11:05, Amit Langote wrote:
> > Okay.  How about the attached?
>
> Thanks for the patches! You added the note just after the description
> about row level security on inherited table, but isn't it better to
> add it before that? Attached patch does that. Thought?

Yeah, that might be a better flow for that paragraph.

> > Maybe, we should also note the LOCK TABLE exception?
>
> Yes.

Note that, unlike TRUNCATE, LOCK TABLE exception exists in HEAD too,
but maybe you're aware of that.

Thanks,
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: table partitioning and access privileges
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Add more compile-time asserts to exposeinconsistencies.