Re: Problem with default partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Problem with default partition pruning
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFZXAZwUDtrCsBQ0wt_jA0Ze2zWgcef0nZWFxYFtSdPpA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problem with default partition pruning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 9:49 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2019-Jul-31, Amit Langote wrote:
> > I noticed that the patch is still marked as "Waiting on Author" ever
> > since Shawn set it that way on June 17.  Since Hosoya-san posted
> > updated patches on June 27, the status should've been changed to
> > "Needs Review".  Or maybe "Ready for Committer", because the last time
> > I looked, at least the default partition pruning issue seems to be
> > sufficiently taken care of by the latest patch.  Whether or not we
> > should apply the other patch (more aggressive use of constraint
> > exclusion by partprune.c on partitioned partitions), I'm not sure, but
> > maybe a committer can decide in an instant. :)
>
> Thanks for the status update.  I intend to get this patch pushed before
> the next set of minors.

Thank you Alvaro.

Regards,
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix typos
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: The unused_oids script should have a reminder to use the8000-8999 OID range