Re: Postgres 11 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFMDYFLMURJm4gike925E2BSsB7yiAUAHQNSOyROcuV4A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres 11 release notes  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Postgres 11 release notes  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Postgres 11 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Bruce.

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2018/05/15 5:30, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I like it, done.
>
> Thank you.

I wonder what you think about including this little performance item:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1eotSQ-0005V0-LV@gemulon.postgresql.org

especially considering the part of the commit message which states

...Still, testing shows
that this makes single-row inserts significantly faster on a table
with many partitions without harming the bulk-insert case.

I recall seeing those inserts being as much as 2x faster as partition
count grows beyond hundreds.  One might argue that we should think
about publicizing this only after we've dealt with the
lock-all-partitions issue that's also mentioned in the commit message
which is still a significant portion of the time spent and I'm totally
fine with that.

Thanks,
Amit


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 11 feature count