Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFBwbmkqvKM-CmoK6yOcokwWcOzjz-fP1O317qn8kgGEA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 23:49 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqFucUh7hYkfZ6x1MVcs_R24eUfNVuRwdE_FwuwK8XpSZg%40mail.gmail.com

Oh, interesting --- I hadn't been paying much attention to that thread.
I'll compare your PoC there to what I did.

Actually, I should’ve said that your patch is much better attempt at getting this in order, so there’s not much to see in my patch really. :)

Thanks,
Amit

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys
Next
From: Mahendra Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum