Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqEZNGG_g2pq-+tTFhj7cqbPtbBRL6Ycgfu_F2t+-ZyWgw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Responses Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent
Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent
Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:23 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> Forking this thread for two tangential patches which I think are more
> worthwhile than the original topic's patch.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200207143935.GP403%40telsasoft.com
>
> Is there a better place to implement assertion from 0002 ?

I would think the answer to that would be related to the answer of why
you think we need this assert in the first place?

I know I have made the mistake of not updating relnatts when I added
relispartition, etc. to pg_class, only to be bitten by it in the form
of seemingly random errors/crashes.  Is that why?

Thanks,
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Haumacher, Bernhard"
Date:
Subject: Re: Error on failed COMMIT
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent