Re: Batching in executor - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Batching in executor
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqEPMwhg6pUE4XML2rG4fRqKMpeGTtMwRPGes90f9iOqtg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Batching in executor  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 3:37 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:40 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That would be nice to see if you have the time, but maybe after I post
> > a new version.
>
> I’ve created a CF entry marked WoA for this in the next CF under the
> title “Batching in executor, part 1: add batch variant of table AM
> scan API.” The idea is to track this piece separately so that later
> parts can have their own entries and we don’t end up with a single
> long-lived entry that never gets marked done. :-)

I intend to continue working on this, so have just moved it into the
next fest.  I will post a new patch version next week that addresses
Daniil's comments and implements a few other things I mentioned I will
in my reply to Tomas on Oct 28; sorry for the delay.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add pg_atomic_unlocked_write_u64
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add pg_atomic_unlocked_write_u64