Re: wait event documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: wait event documentation
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqEJ-eO6e4xh9dxf=mXs1ZJ20poLFH3Rcd8UYcVwi_nidA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to wait event documentation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> By the way, wonder if it wouldn't make sense to take the whole Table 28.1.
>> Dynamic Statistics Views into a new section (perhaps before 28.2 Viewing
>> Locks or after), since those views display information different from what
>> the statistics collector component collects and publishes (those in the
>> Table 28.2. Collected Statistics Views).
>
> It seems a little short for that, doesn't it?  I mean, I'm not against
> it on principle, but we don't want to hoist a 5-line table into a
> section by itself.

I was thinking that if we move Table 28.1 to a new section, Tables
28.3 (pg_stat_activity) to 28.8 (pg_stat_ssl) will go too.

Thanks,
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: wait event documentation
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6