Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqE3RwGpnQzJfbS=TktWCH39HG+530T=C=Bbpa7CVAg2zQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:17 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > CopyReadFromRawBuf as a name for the new function might be misleading
> > as long as we are only using it for binary data.  Maybe
> > CopyReadBinaryData is more appropriate?  See attached v4 with these
> > and a few other cosmetic changes.
> >
>
> CopyReadBinaryData() looks meaningful. +1.

Okay, thanks.   Let's have a committer take a look at this then?

-- 
Amit Langote
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility