On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 5:27 AM Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com> wrote: > So, do you suggest we can have a backpointer of conn also in active_fsstate...?
I think that fsstate and active_fsstate have to be pointing to the same conn_state object. Do you think otherwise?
No, but I don't understand why you think they can be different in the current implementation.
Currently, as per init_scan fsstate->conn_state->active_scan = fsstate, and it is never reassigned or anything.
