Re: Initdb failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rafia Sabih
Subject Re: Initdb failure
Date
Msg-id CA+FpmFc1tOXC1M5mgDghQ1yqRe=d5LZX+xggPc3ko=iHBU+dQw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Initdb failure  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Initdb failure  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 07:39, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Initdb fails when following path is provided as input:
>
datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/datasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafddsdatasadfasfdsafdds/
>
> Also the cleanup also tends to fail in the cleanup path.
>
> Could be something to do with path handling.
This is because the value of MAXPGPATH is 1024 and the path you are
providing is more than that. Hence, when it is trying to read
PG_VERSION in ValidatePgVersion it is going to a wrong path with just
1024 characters.

> I'm not sure if this is already known.
I am also not sure if it is known or intentional. On the other hand I
also don't know if it is practical to give such long names for
database directory anyway.

--
Regards,
Rafia Sabih



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Skip Scan
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs