On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Agreed. The "wait free LW_SHARED" thing[1] I posted recently had a simple
>
> #define pg_atomic_read(atomic) (*(volatile uint32 *)&(atomic))
>
> That should be sufficient and easily greppable, right?
Looks good enough for me. I would consider using a naming scheme that
accounts for possible future uint64 atomics.
Regards,
Ants Aasma
--
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
