Hi,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 2:44 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > The difference is that the purpose of 'synchronized_standby_slots' is
> > to mention slot names for which the user expects logical walsenders to
> > wait before sending the logical changes to subscribers. OTOH,
> > 'synchronous_standby_names' has a different purpose as well. It is not
> > clear to me if the users would be interested in syncing failover slots
> > to all the standbys mentioned in 'synchronous_standby_names'.
> >
>
> Okay, I see your point. But not sure what could be the solution here
> except documenting. But let me think more.
>
That's a great find. I didn't consider mixed physical and logical
replicas in synchronous_standby_names.
I wonder if there are users running synchronous_standby_names with a
mix of logical and
physical replicas and what the use case would be.
Not sure if there's anything straight forward we could do in general
for slot syncing if synchronous_standby_names
refers to application_names of logical replicas, the feature can't be supported.
--
John Hsu - Amazon Web Services
