Re: pg_resetwal: Fix handling of commit timestamp XIDs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chao Li
Subject Re: pg_resetwal: Fix handling of commit timestamp XIDs
Date
Msg-id C9F11553-E5DB-4EBF-A5F2-9857F272C3CB@gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: pg_resetwal: Fix handling of commit timestamp XIDs  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On Sep 29, 2026, at 21:50, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> On 29/09/2026 09:09, Chao Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>> While working on patch [1], I spotted two small issues in pg_resetwal.
>> 1. The -c option accepts two XIDs. The first is parsed by strtouint32_strict(), but the second is parsed by
strtoul().This seems to be an oversight in 636c1914b48, which introduced strtouint32_strict(). 
>> 2. The help message for the -c option says that “zero means no change”, but this behavior is missing on the current
masterbranch. I checked the git history, and the behavior was lost in 978cf02bb8c, which added separate “given” flags
forcommand-line options. 
>> The fixes for both issues are tiny. See the attached patch for details.
>> Unfortunately, I reviewed both patches but didn't notice these issues at the time. Both commits were included in
PG19,so this might be worth back-patching to 19. 
>
> Pushed, thanks!
>
> - Heikki
>

Hi Heikki, thanks for pushing.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/







pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zsolt Parragi
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Implication
Next
From: surya poondla
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_walinspect: add functions to locate and list WAL by time and LSN