Re: Some performance testing? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Graeme B. Bell
Subject Re: Some performance testing?
Date
Msg-id C855EB58-773C-48C4-B30F-64CF2481E69E@skogoglandskap.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to Some performance testing?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Some performance testing?  (Przemysław Deć <przemyslaw.dec@linuxpolska.pl>)
List pgsql-performance
>
> Josh, there seems to be an inconsistency in your blog.  You say 3.10.X is
> safe, but the graph you show with the poor performance seems to be from
> 3.13.X which as I understand it is a later kernel.  Can you clarify which
> 3.X kernels are good to use and which are not?

Sorry to cut in -

So far we've found kernel 3.18 to be excellent for postgres 9.3 performance (pgbench + our own queries run much faster
thanwith the 2.6.32-504 centos 6 kernel, and we haven't encountered random stalls or slowness). 

We use elrepo to get prebuilt rpms of the latest mainline stable kernel (kernel-ml).

http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml

Graeme Bell

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Nolan
Date:
Subject: Re: Some performance testing?
Next
From: Przemysław Deć
Date:
Subject: Re: Some performance testing?