Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Pye
Subject Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python
Date
Msg-id C7401DA6-C02A-4C3F-A60E-160A871E6F13@jwp.name
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On May 29, 2009, at 1:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Friday 29 May 2009 04:06:14 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Otherwise, I'm not too keen simply to throw Python 2.x overboard  
>> until
>> it's no longer common on platforms people are likely to want to  
>> install
>> Postgres on, if that's what's implied by the original question.
>
> My guess is that we will need to keep around a Python 2.x version  
> for at least
> another three years, meaning two or three major PostgreSQL releases.

Yeah, I wasn't meaning to imply tossing 2.x out...


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Konstantin Izmailov
Date:
Subject: Re: information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions