Re: XMAX_LOCK_ONLY and XMAX_COMMITTED (fk/multixact code) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bossart, Nathan
Subject Re: XMAX_LOCK_ONLY and XMAX_COMMITTED (fk/multixact code)
Date
Msg-id C72BAC7C-36D9-4282-B6C8-1C04F4F33DE1@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: XMAX_LOCK_ONLY and XMAX_COMMITTED (fk/multixact code)  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: XMAX_LOCK_ONLY and XMAX_COMMITTED (fk/multixact code)  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/29/21, 10:10 AM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
> Okay, I'll do it that way in the next revision.

v2 attached.

Nathan


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Deprecating the term "super-exclusive lock"
Next
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: Can I assume relation would not be invalid during from ExecutorRun to ExecutorEnd