Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Burd, Greg
Subject Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes
Date
Msg-id C6C63FAF-10EA-4E58-81C3-BA4F609541CC@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Feb 9, 2025, at 1:14 AM, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
> 
> I think that the goal of this patch is interesting and desirable.

Thanks for taking a look at it. Which version did you prefer, v3 or v4?

> The greatest concern for me is the performance impact.

Agreed, I’m still looking for ways to minimize it (suggestions welcome).

> I think that a switch is warranted, but I am not sure if it should be a GUC.
> Wouldn't it be better to have a reloption, so that this can be configured per table?

I can remove the GUC in favor of a reloption, that makes sense to me.

> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe

best,

-greg

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc: Move standalone backup section, mention -X argument
Next
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: Enhancing Memory Context Statistics Reporting