Re: Do I have a hardware or a software problem? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Niels Kristian Schjødt
Subject Re: Do I have a hardware or a software problem?
Date
Msg-id C6A943C0-BD00-4CC2-9D37-43EF2D98027F@autouncle.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do I have a hardware or a software problem?  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Do I have a hardware or a software problem?  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Well, In fact I do (as you can see from my configuration). I have a similar server running with hot standby replication - and it runs two 3T HDD in a RAID1 array.

So - is it still very bad if I choose to put four intel 520 disks in a RAID10 array on the other production server?

Den 12/12/2012 kl. 03.47 skrev Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>:

On 12/12/2012 10:13 AM, Evgeny Shishkin wrote:

Yes, i am aware of this issue. Never experienced this neither on intel 520, no ocz vertex 3.


I wouldn't trust either of those drives. The 520 doesn't have Intel's " Enhanced Power Loss Data Protection"; it's going to lose its buffers if it loses power. Similarly, the Vertex 3 doesn't have any kind of power protection. See:

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/solid-state-drives/ssd-320-series-power-loss-data-protection-brief.html
http://ark.intel.com/products/family/56572/Intel-SSD-500-Family

http://www.ocztechnology.com/res/manuals/OCZ_SSD_Breakdown_Q2-11_1.pdf

The only way I'd use those for a production server was if I had synchronous replication running to another machine with trustworthy, durable storage - and if I didn't mind some downtime to restore the corrupt DB from the replica after power loss.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Evgeny Shishkin
Date:
Subject: Re: hash join vs nested loop join
Next
From: Alejandro Carrillo
Date:
Subject: Read rows deleted