Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Luke Lonergan
Subject Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
Date
Msg-id C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF804382037@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives  (Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>)
Responses Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives  (Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>)
Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives  (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>)
Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives  (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> I don't see how that's better at all; in fact, it reduces to
> exactly the same problem: given two pieces of data which
> disagree, which is right?

The one that matches the checksum.

- Luke


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Stone
Date:
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
Next
From: Albert Cervera Areny
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad RAID1 read performance