Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Luke Lonergan
Subject Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
Date
Msg-id C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF802AF2F1B@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives  ("Rajesh Kumar Mallah" <mallah.rajesh@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
List pgsql-performance

It's created when the data is written to both drives.

This is standard stuff, very well proven: try googling 'self healing zfs'.

- Luke

Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Michael Stone [mailto:mstone+postgres@mathom.us]
Sent:   Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:11 AM Eastern Standard Time
To:     pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject:        Re: [PERFORM] setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:36:48AM -0400, Luke Lonergan wrote:
>> I don't see how that's better at all; in fact, it reduces to
>> exactly the same problem: given two pieces of data which
>> disagree, which is right? 
>
>The one that matches the checksum.

And you know the checksum is good, how?

Mike Stone

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Stone
Date:
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives