Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Date
Msg-id C19C559C-78BA-4065-80F9-D4B1858ADADD@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sep 10, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> no - we have to_char function, why we need different formatting  
>> system?
>
> Why do we need this at all, when we have the concatenation operator?
> I think the point of it is that people are used to how sprintf works.
> So it should work as nearly like sprintf as possible.

+1

David


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Ragged CSV import