Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Imseih (AWS), Sami
Subject Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem
Date
Msg-id C0F1F23F-3F32-4B64-A31C-9FC92BE41A3F@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem
List pgsql-hackers
> This looks mostly fine to me modulo "sort or hash". I do see many
> instances of "and/or" in the docs. Maybe that would work better.

"sort or hash operations at the same time" is clear explanation IMO.

This latest version of the patch looks good to me.

Regards,

Sami







pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Subscription statistics are not dropped at DROP SUBSCRIPTION in some cases
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node