Re: HA Setup Review - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Scott Ribe
Subject Re: HA Setup Review
Date
Msg-id C0889997-8DA2-479B-82D0-C8945A35FF7E@elevated-dev.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HA Setup Review  (akshay polji <akshay.polji@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: HA Setup Review  (akshay polji <akshay.polji@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
> On Apr 30, 2024, at 10:29 AM, akshay polji <akshay.polji@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So do you think that even such a cluster with 3 node pgpool + postgresql (running on the same machine)  Synchronous
Replication(Any one out of the two replicas) would mean Primary DB will be at risk of degraded performance?  

All cloud providers have downtime and outages. Maybe this is reliable enough for you, but just don't treat it as a
guarantee.The point is: if a network glitch, or failure of a replica, can cascade to cause failure of primary, is that
reallyHA? 




pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: akshay polji
Date:
Subject: Re: HA Setup Review
Next
From: akshay polji
Date:
Subject: Re: HA Setup Review