..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language.. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Martin Gainty
Subject ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language..
Date
Msg-id BLU142-W28F5839D58683ADAB6235AEA30@phx.gbl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Trigger vs web service  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Responses Re: ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language..
Re: ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language..
List pgsql-general
..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language..
to whom might you be alluding to
???

Martin
______________________________________________
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
 
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.





> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:57:11 -0700
> From: pierce@hogranch.com
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Trigger vs web service
>
> On 04/04/11 8:47 AM, Marc-André Goderre wrote:
> >
> > 1- Program a trigger function detecting the orginal insert, split the
> > string and fill the other field.
> >
> > 2- Program a web service for receiving the string, split it and insert
> > the informations in the db.
> >
> > Witch is the fastest one (in performance).
> >
>
> I would expect parsing and splitting your string into fields before
> handing it to SQL would be faster than handing it into SQL, then using a
> trigger to hack it into 2 fields. This would, of course, at least
> partially depend on what sort of language that web service is written
> in, if its in some hypothetical horribly inefficient interpreted
> language, all bets are off.
>
> Does all your data go through a web service now? if not, what data
> path IS it coming from?
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Large Object permissions lost in transfer
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: ..horribly documented, inefficient, user-hostile, impossible to maintain interpreted language..