Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Martin Gainty
Subject Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages
Date
Msg-id BLU142-W12DB464E08A45E5C98839AAE7A0@phx.gbl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Invocation overhead for procedural languages  (Giorgio Valoti <giorgio_v@mac.com>)
List pgsql-general
if you're using apache yes your module's performance is related to how many child processes are spawned by mod_prefork

http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/prefork.html

HTH
Martin
______________________________________________
Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.


> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> From: giorgio_v@mac.com
> Subject: [GENERAL] Invocation overhead for procedural languages
> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:44:16 +0200
>
> Hi all, I think I’ve read somewhere in the documentation that the
> invocation of functions written in procedural languages (with the
> exception of plpgsql) incur in performance hit due to the call the
> language interpreter. Is that correct or am I completely off track?
>
> Thank you in advance
> --
> Giorgio Valoti
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Get Windows Live and get whatever you need, wherever you are. Start here.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Initdb problem on debian mips cobalt: Bus error
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: Invocation overhead for procedural languages