Re: About tapes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From mac_man2005@hotmail.it
Subject Re: About tapes
Date
Msg-id BLU0-SMTP53C0E8BB213EDAEE55F362E6C00@phx.gbl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: About tapes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: About tapes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ok, so let's try asking the question in another way.

Which is the difference between having more than one tape into a file 
and having one tape per file?
I mean, we are peaking runs belonging to different tapes and merge those 
runs.

Moreover, why space is reduced taking in account that we can free the 
read tuples, when both using one tape per file or more tapes per file?



Il 18/06/2010 21:16, Robert Haas ha scritto:
> I think that the comment is saying that it *would* take 2x or 4x the
> input space IF we created a separate file for each input.  So instead
> we don't.
>
>    



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: About tapes
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: About tapes