Re: procpid? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bernd Helmle
Subject Re: procpid?
Date
Msg-id BD0EAD6DDD5F34A9C66F7782@apophis.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: procpid?  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
Responses Re: procpid?
Re: procpid?
List pgsql-hackers

--On 15. Juni 2011 16:47:55 +0000 Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:

> Or perhaps pg_connections. Yes, +1 to making things fully backwards
> compatible by keeping pg_stat_activity around but making a better
> designed and better named table (view/SRF/whatever).

I thought about that too when reading the thread the first time, but 
"pg_stat_sessions" sounds better. Our documentation also primarily refers to a 
database connection as a "session", i think.

-- 
Thanks
Bernd


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: bad posix_fadvise support causes initdb to exit ungracefully
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID