Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kääriäinen Anssi
Subject Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
Date
Msg-id BC19EF15D84DC143A22D6A8F2590F0A788641330BF@EXMAIL.stakes.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?  (Kääriäinen Anssi <anssi.kaariainen@thl.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sorry, I forgot to include the version used & some information about my setup:
PostgreSQL version: Git HEAD as of:
Date:   Fri Oct 28 21:18:36 2011 -0400
Commit: 51eba98cf4595e90730dedd9305da8aa84b649ee

Compiled with defaults, (only change --with-pgport = 5431). I used default
settings, shared_buffers size is 24MB. The system is Linux Mint Debian edition
(kernel 3.0.0, gcc 4.6.1). The interesting parts about my hardware were in the
original post.
- Anssi



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kääriäinen Anssi
Date:
Subject: Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Add socket dir to pg_config..?