Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

On Aug 28, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Robert Bernier wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 August 2007 11:06, Dave Page wrote:
>> Decibel! wrote:
>>> I think we can just as easily make the change without any real
>>> fanfare
>>> at all.
>>
>> I'm inclined to agree. For the most part we could all just slowly
>> change
>> things to 'Postgres'. I doubt anyone would really notice, except we'd
>> get fewer people getting it wrong!
>
> How about a vote?
>
> How many people feel we should adopt 'postgres' for the '9.0'
> reference documentation (let's leave the issue of the tons of work
> involved out of the debate for the moment)?

I vote we just make the change without any fuss, ASAP. But I'll take
any kind of change over sticking with PostgreSQL.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby                        decibel@decibel.org
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)