Re: Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jean-Pierre Pelletier
Subject Re: Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000
Date
Msg-id BAYC1-PASMTP044ED0490DBB2B1FA9AC3795820@CEZ.ICE
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2, Windows 2000  ("Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>)
List pgsql-bugs
Yes, there is an antivirus software on the machine, a reboot is needed when
it's turned off,
I'll be allowed to reboot it tonight or I'll do it sooner if it crashes
before that.

There are around 15 connections to PostgreSQL when it crashes but most are
idle
there may be a few inserts but no bulk inserts, the biggest load would come
from
select statements.

Jean-Pierre Pelletier

----- Original Message -----
From: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
To: <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:03 AM
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Possibly corrupted shared memory, PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2,
Windows 2000


>
> ""Jean-Pierre Pelletier"" <pelletier_32@sympatico.ca> wrote
>>
>> I've installed PostgreSQL 8.1 beta2 five days ago and it crashed 3 times
>> since then.
>> Here is what's been logged for the last crash
>>
>> 2005-10-04 11:00:19 FATAL:  could not read block 121 of relation
>> 1663/16384/2608: Invalid argument
>>
>> relation 2608 is pg_depend
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The crash before that was on relation pg_type, the first line logged was:
>> 2005-10-03 10:51:06 FATAL:  could not read block 38 of relation
>> 1663/16384/1247: Invalid argument
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The first crash was also on relation pg_depend, but with open instead or
>> read
>> 2005-09-30 18:38:53 FATAL:  could not open relation 1663/16384/2608:
>> Invalid argument
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
> This problem was reported several times before, but not necessarily system
> tables. Is there any anti-virus softwares installed on the same machine?
> Is the database under intensive IO pressure?
>
> Regards,
> Qingqing
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>               http://archives.postgresql.org

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug?: Text after right paren in query is ignored
Next
From: "Jose Vasquez"
Date:
Subject: BUG #1939: enhancement