>"Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@hotmail.com> writes:
> > this patch ensures independency datetime fields on current datestyle
> > setting. Add new internal datestyle USE_XSD_DATESTYLE. It's almoust same
>to
> > USE_ISO_DATESTYLE. Differences are for timestamp:
>
> > ISO: yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss
> > XSD: yyyy-mm-ddThh24:mi:ss
>
>Why is that a good idea? Even if some standard out there mandates the
>'T', I'd bet lunch that the other format is a whole lot more portable.
>
if you use xsd schema then situation is clear. I have to respect it, because
xsd:datetime is well defined and SQL/XML expect respecting xsd. If I don't
use xsd schema, then I teoreticly can put date in any format. Sample: we use
german format, but everybody with good mind doesn't use it for xml, because
then he cannot use xml validation based on xsd schema.
xsd format use Oracle 10g:
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=467278&tstart=0
9x used ISO format, which is (however) invalid.
http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/ch19-77049.html
Currently without this patch PostgreSQL generate invalalid xml documents.
That is all.
My patch doesn't protect any output. Simply use cast to text, or to_char
fce.
nice a day
Pavel Stehule
_________________________________________________________________
Citite se osamele? Poznejte nekoho vyjmecneho diky Match.com.
http://www.msn.cz/
