Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Laurent Laborde
Subject Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1
Date
Msg-id BANLkTinvB0F+f6fs1f-jG82WkEWKmRshTw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1  (Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>)
Responses Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1  (Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org> wrote:
>
> The performance here looks like the old jmicron based ssds that had
> absolutely abysmal performance - the intel x25s do not suffer like this. The
> x25's however suffer from the power durability Greg has mentioned.  (And
> they will eventually need to be security erase'd to restore performance -
> you'll start getting major write stalls). Looks like you were on the cusp of
> stalling here.

A review of the V+100 on the excellent anandtech :
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4010/kingston-ssdnow-v-plus-100-review

> btw, yay pgiosim! :)

yay \o/

--
Laurent "ker2x" Laborde
Sysadmin & DBA at http://www.over-blog.com/

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: not using partial index
Next
From: Shaun Thomas
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql random io test with 2 SSD Kingston V+100 500GB in (software) Raid1