Re: pgpool versus sequences - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pgpool versus sequences
Date
Msg-id BANLkTingyUTptpHVPENFsEfMn4fSP5WH+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgpool versus sequences  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pgpool versus sequences
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Please note also that what pgpool users have got right now is a time
> bomb, which is not better than immediately-visible breakage.  I would
> prefer to try to get this change out ahead of widespread adoption of the
> broken pgpool version.

Hmm, I gather from what Tatsuo is saying at the web site that this has
only been broken since the release of 3.0 on February 23rd, so given
that I think your approach makes sense.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pgpool versus sequences
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgpool versus sequences