Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date
Msg-id BANLkTinTjxP5hBe0DsywFEoFLsxO5rcWwA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 5 May 2011 00:18, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On 5/4/2011 1:26 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>
>> If we're talking about marketing jargon, how about getting *really*
>> out there with "lightening tables".  Built for speed but not
>> persistence.
>>
>> Hey, nobody liked evanescent, so I'm trying a different route...
>
> ACID Free.

Low Fat Tables?

The problem with a nice marketable name is the potential to mislead.
Fast Tables is the simplest so far, but it kinda suggests it's a
special new type of table only distinguished by the fact that it's
faster.

Thom

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory