Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date
Msg-id BANLkTinQBTwXv5ZDrAcu+oTbt9xXJFd3mQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 3 May 2011 19:45, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 20:07, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>> Part of the problem is the name we're using for the feature.  "Unlogged
>> tables" sounds like we've taken something away and are calling that a
>> feature.  "Now with no brakes!"  As feature names go, it's as unsexy as
>> you can get.
>
> "nosql tables"? ;)

In all seriousness, I think it's important we should not mention
anything like that at any point. :S

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory