Re: procpid? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: procpid?
Date
Msg-id BANLkTinLb=PfdHe9u3UBQNB3DKGEcGp3hQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: procpid?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> If we were going to make changes like this, I'd suggest we save them
> up in a big bag for when we change major version number. Everybody in
> the world thinks that PostgreSQL v8 is compatible across all versions
> (8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4), and it will be same with v9. That way we
> would still have forward progress, but in more sensible sized steps.
> Otherwise we just break the code annually for all the people that
> support us. If we had a more stable environment for tools vendors,
> maybe people wouldn't need to be manually typing procpid anyway...

Amen.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: CreateComments: use explicit indexing for ``values''
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] SECURITY LABEL on shared database object