Re: InitProcGlobal cleanup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: InitProcGlobal cleanup
Date
Msg-id BANLkTin2TpCjFOGde68A2cOUDACoE-gLbw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to InitProcGlobal cleanup  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses 9.2 branch and 9.1beta2 timing (was Re: InitProcGlobal cleanup)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> OK, here's a version with more comments.
>
> Looks OK to me, assuming you've checked that the right number of PGPROCs
> are getting created (in particular the AV launcher is no longer
> accounted for explicitly).

That should be fine, due to the way MaxBackends is initialized.  See
related comment around guc.c:103.

I'll commit this to 9.2 after we branch.  (When are we doing that, BTW?)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Domains versus polymorphic functions, redux
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Identifying no-op length coercions