On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 16:21, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> "ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu> wrote:
>
>> maybe we can do some tweaking our search engine to improve it.
>
> A custom dictionary to carefully add a few synonyms might go a long
> way. I often need to try a number of permutations of likely words
> to get relevant hits.
If you can provide one, please do :-)
Right now, all we have is:
postgres postgres
postgresql postgres
pgsql postgres
pg postgres
postgre postgres
> Including the subject line in searches, with a higher weight than
> message body text, would also be great.
We already do this - we set them to class "A" with setweight().
> Possibly it would help to be able to search on From or To fields
> (including CC in the To). Sometimes you have some recollection who
> participated in a discussion, but can't find the magic terms to get
> a small result set which includes the right discussion.
This we don't do -w e store the From field, but we don't index it. And
we don't do anything with the To field.
So that's certainly something we could add.
> I really think some pretty minor tweaks in these areas would go a
> very long way toward making the archive searches more useful.
Any patches are definitely welcome - you can find the search system at
https://pgweb.postgresql.org/browser/trunk/portal/tools/search :-)
(for the archives, you're probably most interested in
classes/ArchiveIndexer.class.php and the sql/functions.sql file)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
