Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed
Date
Msg-id BANLkTimwexT+XFbwOvahjd0bkcwTEQ36Qg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 16:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> We discussed earlier to potentially block the creation, and removal,
>> of branches on the origin server, to prevent mistakes like this. It
>> has only happened once in almost a year, so it's probably not
>> necessary - but I wanted to raise the option anyway in case people
>> forgot about it.
>
>> The downside would be that in order to create or drop a branch *when
>> intended* a committer would need someone from the infrastructure team
>> to temporarily switch off the branch-blocking setting, and then back
>> on..
>
> I think it would be sensible to block branch removal, as there's
> basically never a scenario where we'd do that during current usage.
> I'm not excited about blocking branch addition, although I worry
> sooner or later somebody will accidentally push a private development
> branch :-(.  Is it possible to block only removal and not addition?

Yes, I think so. Either way it'll require a small addition to the
scripts we're using, so I'll try to just turn it into two different
settings. I don't see offhand any reason why this shouldn't work.


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Branch refs/heads/REL9_1_STABLE was removed
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Range Types, constructors, and the type system