Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Claudio Freire
Subject Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?
Date
Msg-id BANLkTimvHBwg88a-WDxhz-=Ts6Ry6wNApQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?  (Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> "IMMUTABLE indicates that the function cannot modify the database and
> always returns the same result when given the same argument values"
>
> Emphasis on "always".  If the result of the function, given the same
> argument values, can be different after a SET, then it doesn't qualify
> for immutability.  At least, that's my understanding.

That's a ridiculous use of the word "Immutable"

In any CS class, the timezone would be an implicit input to the
function. So it would be immutable in *that* sense (it also takes
timezone into consideration).

Perhaps the optimizer should take contextual information that cannot
change inside a query as input too.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: %100 CPU on Windows Server 2003
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: Constraint exclusion can't process simple constant expressions?