Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name
Date
Msg-id BANLkTimqTAxjegTwXb-AUPoqV_NOmc4Xuw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On tis, 2011-04-05 at 11:21 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> +1 on using $foo.  Even with the standardization risk I think it's the
>> best choice. Prefer $"foo" to ${foo} though.
>
> What standardization risk?  The standard has already existed for >10
> years and is widely implemented.

What is the standard, and who is it that has implemented it that way?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jesper Krogh
Date:
Subject: Visibillity testing - some numbers on current performance.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Visibillity testing - some numbers on current performance.