Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability
Date
Msg-id BANLkTimZz2CnqYWOqoh0=HMH4eWvEioDjA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
Responses Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:31 PM, David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org> wrote:
>
> this). The technology and manufacturing processes are common across many
> different types of product. They either all work , or they all fail.

Most of it is.  But certain parts are fairly new, i.e. the
controllers.  It is quite possible that all these various failing
drives share some long term ~ 1 year degradation issue like the 6Gb/s
SAS ports on the early sandybridge Intel CPUs.  If that's the case
then the just plain up and dying thing makes some sense.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Boreham
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability
Next
From: David Boreham
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability