Re: Fw: [BUGS] BUG #6011: Some extra messages are output in the event log at PostgreSQL startup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Fw: [BUGS] BUG #6011: Some extra messages are output in the event log at PostgreSQL startup
Date
Msg-id BANLkTim85U5mdLzByeMWwiheEOm8+ZR_Ew@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fw: [BUGS] BUG #6011: Some extra messages are output in the event log at PostgreSQL startup  ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Fw: [BUGS] BUG #6011: Some extra messages are output in the event log at PostgreSQL startup
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:49, MauMau <maumau307@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
>>
>> "MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Make pg_ctl's -s option suppress informational event logging.
>>
>> This will ultimately be up to a committer (and I'm not one), but to
>> me it seems reasonable to back-patch if it is addressed this way.
>>
>>
>>> the PostgreSQL Windows service must be registered by "pg_ctl
>>> register -s" to make use of this patch. However, according to the
>>> current manual, "pg_ctl register" does not take -s option.
>>> Actually, pg_ctl does not refuse to take -s, so this is not a big
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> pg_ctl register [-N servicename] [-U username] [-P password]
>>> [-D datadir] [-w] [-t seconds] [-o options]
>>
>> When you write the patch, be sure to include a fix for the docs
>> here, please.
>>
>
> I attached a patch to fix this bug. I performed the following tests
> successfully on Windows Vista (32-bit).
>
<snip test cases>

> I wish this will be back-patched in the next minor release.

Thanks, sorry about the delay, patch applied. I backpatched it back to
8.3 which is as far as it applied cleanly - I'm not excited enough
about it to bother a manual backpatch to 8.2.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: .gitignore for some of cygwin files
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: tuning autovacuum